Generator 21 masthead. COVER -> RECOMMENDED DAILY REQUIREMENT

A spaceholder
Travel graphic

Experience online travel as you've never seen it before! A vast array of exotic destinations, beautiful resorts, exciting tours and romantic getaways await. The Global Travel BillBoard Directory -- the only site where travel truly comes to life!


RECOMMENDED DAILY REQUIREMENT

A space holder.RDR logo

DATELINE: 7 May, 2001

Transmitted by Rod Amis, USA

The World's Magazine: generator21.net

Event # 265: Have Fun, Will Travel

Next Update Scheduled for: 18 May
AMERICAN DREAMS
DAY ONE
G21 BARNES & NOBLE SEARCH ENGINE
G21 AFRICA
G21 Daily Cartoon
G21 Digital Internet Postcards
JOIN OUR MAILING LIST. You'll be glad you did. Surveys that affect our look and feel and much more. Be part of the In-Crowd!

G21 E-MAIL NEWSLETTER


G21 EUROPE
G21 LATIN AMERICA
G21 NEWS
HOLLYWOOD & VINES
HOT LINKS
MY GLASS HOUSE
MYTHVILLE PROJECT
POWERSSOUND
RADIOACTIVE
RDR
Search Engine Collection
SILVER SURF
TABLOID HART
THE SEX COLUMN
VICTORIA'S SECRETS
VOX POPULI

RECOMMENDED DAILY REQUIREMENT ARCHIVES.
MEMOIRS OF THE INFO AGE ARCHIVES.

G21 STUFF: SHOW THE PRIDE. Why wear that T-shirt or sweats from Nike when you can sport the splendiferous G21 blue logo? Let people know you're In The Know with G21 gear. Follow that link and find it here. Thank you so much!!!

LAST WEEK's EDITION

MEET THE G-CREW! These are the people behind this jam-band every week.

HOME



TABLE OF CONTENTS & BACK ISSUES

To read this article in Deutsch, Francaise, Italiano, Portuguese, Espanol, copy and paste the complete URL("http://www.generator21.net/dailymy7.htm") and enter it in the box after you click through.

RDR Logo. WHIPPING BOYS - Our "friends" on the Right have, over the years, assembled a whole group of Whipping Boys which they gleefully trot out when outlining -- to those unfortunates among us who (it is presumed)cannot think for themselves -- their ideas. These Whipping Boys are trotted out to demonstrate how conservative prescriptions will cure the cultural and moral illness of the nation -- whatever nation -- and restore backbone to the body politic. (The presumption here being that the body politic actually had backbone in some mythical by-gone Golden Age which none of the prescriptors can quite put a date or time on.) Among these now-familiar Whipping Boys are The Social Welfare State (which, the argument goes, creates a cycle of laziness and illegitimate births,) High Taxes (which penalize the rich unfairly and sap ones in-born spirit of innovation and entrepreneurialism,) Immigration (which allows people unlike "us" to bleed the national wealth and mongrelize the culture,) and Big Government (which is by its very nature inefficient, corrupt, and sinister, and from which all the foregoing evils must naturally flow.) Let's take a look ar these straw arguments for what they are, shall we?

It is convenient for our friends on the Right to forget the historical reality which brought about the modern "Welfare State," for example. They forget that the great push for a system of legislated and government-administered relief came about during the Great Depression of the last century when people could find no work. Anywhere. One of the contributing factors which led to people not being able to find work was that factories had to be closed, banks failed and businesses faltered because people who thought as rightists continue to think squandered the national wealth, indeed the wealth of the entire industrialized world, speculating wildly in the stock markets -- unfettered by silly, restrictive government regulations and "punitive" taxation. It's easy for the celebrants of deregulation, like our Messrs. Buckley and Will here in the United States, to forget this historical reality during their pontification because it undercuts their facile arguments.

But -- more to the point -- the reason that the idea of, yes, redistribution of the national wealth in such a way as to provide a safety net for the lowest rungs of society -- women and children who could not then fend for themselves -- was first compassion and secondly that these unfortunates were considered the future of the nation and part of its human capital. (This was suggested in another essay featured here last week, quoting former French President Charles de Gaulle.)

It has always been considered the chivalrous thing, at the very least, to place our women and children first -- unless you are a hard-nosed and blue-nosed, dyed-in-necktie capitalist. If you are among the latter, women and children are the first "burdens" to be jettisoned from your considerations. They fail to "pull their own weight" in such a view of the world.

Perhaps that is why, at least here in America -- and I see the trend in the more conservative nostroms of other Western nations -- women and children are the first to be savaged when "reforming" the social welfare system. It's easy to forget that the social welfare system's primary function is to ensure that children do not go hungry, schools are adequately stocked with books and teachers, medical care is given to our most vulnerable citizens and that they are assured shelter.

Our friends on the Right see nothing inherently wrong with families being reduced to penury and forced to live in their cars, rats in tenements and housing projects, and a high infant mortality rate in the richest country on earth due to lack of healthcare for the poor and low birthweight babies. They believe that these swinish conditions will force the less fortunate to "get off their duffs and go to work." Yes...

When preparing their budgetary prescriptions, of course, our friends on the right do not speak of what they are taking away from the poor -- such as food out of their mouths, doctor visits when they are ill, or a chance at having a roof over their heads. Our friends on the right say they are forcing people to give up "dependency" on government largesse, eliminating the "nanny state" and helping to "build moral fiber."

To make but a single point, in a nation where a full third of the households are headed by single women, most of them working,

I'm quite sure that if the landlords and merchants on the Right were willing to charge women 72 cents for every dollar a man was charge, on rent or groceries, daycare and transportation --- as they are more than willing to pay them 72 cents for every dollar paid a man to do the same job -- our women would have far fewer complaints about the social order.

Rod Amis
Photo of Rod Amis
Let's turn to that specious argument about the "evil" of high taxes.

What exactly are taxes for? What are they supposed to provide? Well, let's see:

  1. A national defense
  2. A physical infrastructure for life and commerce (policing, fire departments, roads and bridges, schools, buildings in which to house these and the governmental functions and functionaries to administer and support them)
  3. Salaries to support the real people performing tasks one and two.

Intriguingly, our friends on the right fail to ever mention that the United States has the least taxed population in the industrialized world. We pay far less for everything from education to gasoline for our cars than any other industrialized nation on the face of the earth, in fact. One suspects that they ignore this reality when whipping this particular boy because we also happen to be the least educated, most unhealthy people on earth, too --- unless we are rich.

There's a strange correlation between the people saying that we DON'T need higher taxes and those who can afford to buy privately what most Americans have to have some assistance in acquiring --- like adequate healthcare, for instance.

It's also inconvenient for our friends seeking lower taxation to have to admit that there are potholes in our major highways, our cities are rotting like old, bad apples and that our schools are over-crowded and crumbling.

They certainly believe that if we invest more money in tests, rather than good teachers, the results will be more positive in the educational sphere.

It is patently clear, to move forward, that in a nation where 99% of the population can trace their roots to some other country that immigration is an evil. How could we leftists have missed this fact so evident to our friends on the right?

One of the primary reasons that immigration is evil, their argument goes, is that it serves to dilute and mongrelize the ineffable, rock solid American character and heritage. America was not founded as an experiment in democracy at all, you see, and the Bill of Rights was a grudgingly accepted add-on to what was otherwise an admirable Constitution.

Those words that Frenchman put on the Statue of Liberty are an heretical burden and should likely be expunged.

No! There is a long-standing American heritage, a Christian-only heritage as unchanging as a Norman Rockwell cover on the Saturday Evening Post: white, small-town, provincial and virtuous. It speaks English only and does not stoop to learn other languages as people might on other continents, steadfast as it is in its purity. It goes by the name of Babbitt... or Buchanan, Will or Buckley, and would never have a name like Gershwin or Brezinski, Frankfurter or DuBois.

This fabled America must be defended from being weakened and mongrelized by the threatening political notions and religious challenges that come with bringing foreigners into our midsts -- they remind us, these guardians of our national character -- because it is so fragile (like a hot-house flower of their imaginings) and unsure of itself.

Again, as with all of their prescriptions for society, ANYTHING which threatens their power or privilege is suspect. We are again called upon, we misguided leftists and our fellow-travelers, to ignore the historical reality that whenever this argument of exclusivity to a special or divine right was put forward in human history it has had as its handmaiden inquisitions, pogroms, ostracisms, genocide and victimization.

And, finally, we come to the problem, the cruel nature, of Big Government.

One of the worst crimes of Big Government, of course, is that it regulates commerce and society. Big Government makes it more difficult to leave arsenic in the drinking water, to deplete the ozone, to contaminate the rivers with chemical run-offs and the clouds with acid rain. Big Government and its damnable regulations fetter the growth of Big Business, which we all know benefits everyone, by requiring vehicles, toys, drugs, food, tools, housing, etc. to be safe for human beings --- at great and unreasonable expense to Big Business. Surely, anyone with half-a-brain, goes the argument of our friends, can see that all these regulations are a burden and stunt the growth of the free market!

While stuffing the wallets, paying for junkets, and generally wining and dining politicians in return for favors or pouring money into political parties is just an expression of the Free Speech of Big Business, supporting the notion of having a government which just might still manage to protect the health and (urp!) welfare of its citizens is bad for society.

Their homilies try to convince us that the rights of the average person are their concern and the reason they are against Big Government. But look past the homilies and to the legislation they put forward and support and you will immediately see that our friends are not inherently against government, they are against government that keeps them from doing whatever they damned well please to make a buck, safe or unsafe.

They could not care less about the impact on the average person. They never think about the average person. They only think about their net worth and how to make it larger. Period. When government -- by way of rules and regulations which benefit the little guy, keep him from getting poisoned or injured --- stands in their way, it is immediately demonized as "Big Government."

I bring these hard facts to your attention because some time today, or tomorrow at the latest, you're going to hear one or all of these Whipping Boys trotted out by someone in your government or the press. Keep them in mind and enjoy a cynical laugh with me.



This week's Poll: If there's one thing I hold sacred, it is ...? Vote now!

WEB SITE PICK OF THE DAY: Another one from Dmitri. Don't be so fast to rush off to that Gap store. Find out what else this company is about. Check out the GapSucks Web site.
*** Have you tried our TABLE OF CONTENTS & BACK ISSUE INFORMATION? Why not? ***



Go to the TRC!
Travel Radio Channel




Our floral line.

Hey, Kids! Why not submit your own thoughts, rants, reminiscences, anecdotes or jokes to G21 RECOMMENDED DAILY REQUIREMENT? It's easy! Just send an e-mail note to OUR EDITOR, with subject line "RDR."
+++ THE PREVIOUS RDR +++

+++ THE RDR Archives +++

RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE


HotBot Search for

MY GLASS HOUSE | THE PREVIOUS EVENT | COMING ATTRACTIONS | THE WRITERS/GUIDELINES |  






© 2001, GENERATOR 21.

E-mail your comments. We still like to hear from you. Send your snide remarks to info@generator21.net.